If the Great Man Theory holds true, what is the primary factor attributed to military success?

The Great Man Theory is a perspective in leadership that posits that significant leaders are born and not made, suggesting that certain individuals have inherent qualities that make them effective leaders. If this theory holds true, the primary factor attributed to military success would center around the natural characteristics and capabilities of those leaders, particularly the ability to recruit and select individuals with exceptional qualities and skills.

Recruiting the right people emphasizes the importance of identifying and bringing on board those who possess innate traits that align with military success, such as bravery, strategic insight, and decisiveness. This notion aligns with the Great Man Theory, as it suggests that successful leadership emerges from individuals who naturally embody these qualities, rather than being the result of external training, planning, technology, or processes.

In this context, while elements like strategic planning, innovative technology, and extensive training programs are all important in military operations, they do not align with the core tenet of the Great Man Theory. The emphasis here is on the inherent attributes of leaders themselves, arguing that these qualities are what primarily drive military success.